{"id":7818,"date":"2023-11-11T06:05:12","date_gmt":"2023-11-11T05:05:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.believerspray.com\/?p=7818"},"modified":"2023-11-11T06:05:12","modified_gmt":"2023-11-11T05:05:12","slug":"a-history-of-the-corruptions-of-christianity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.believerspray.com\/a-history-of-the-corruptions-of-christianity\/","title":{"rendered":"A History Of The Corruptions Of Christianity"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The Origins Of Christian Corruption<\/h2>\n

Christianity is one of the oldest and most influential religions in the world and has been subject to many corruptions throughout history. The development of corrupt practices began with the earliest days of the church with certain practices that were meant to appeal to pagans and seemed to contradict the teachings of Jesus and the other Apostles. Various Church Fathers and political rulers over the centuries developed further corruptions, with many pre-Reformation and post-Reformation churches introducing numerous doctrinal arrangements to keep control of the people.
\nIn the earliest days of the Church, origin stories about Jesus’ life and teachings were adapted to fit Roman culture, including the introduction of the idea of a ‘Supreme Being’ as well as the glorification of Emperor Constantine’s rule. This process of ‘Christification’ had a concrete shape in the form of a hierarchy of priests and bishops that gradually began to resemble the hierarchical system of Roman civilization. The veneration of saints and the Church’s involvement in Roman politics and rituals eventually meant that Church should remain unified with Rome in order to survive.
\nAt the same time, religious movements that conflicted with the emerging Christian orthodoxy – such as Gnosticism, Montanism and Donatism – were persecuted. This was due to their refusal to accept the authority of the Church Fathers, and instead choose to trust the guidance of the Bible and prayer. Over time, the establishment of church canon and traditions was largely replaced by Church tradition and enforced by political force.<\/p>\n

The Development Of Church Doctrine And Practice<\/h2>\n

The corruption of Christianity continued to spread over the centuries, with certain church teachings and practices developing in order to maintain control of the population and ensure its dominance over the laity. The introduction of the idea of purgatory, various excommunications and indulgences widened the rift between the Church and its people. Furthermore, the belief in transubstantiation, which entails the transformation of the Eucharistic wafer into the body of Christ during communion, further encouraged the idea that Church authority should not be challenged.
\nCertain practices such as the sale of indulgences, whereby a person could receive a reduction of their sins after donating money to the Church, gained considerable popularity. The concept of the ‘Divine Right of Kings’ — that rulers are ordained by God and thus are answerable only to Him — was also adopted by the Church and propped up by the use of its doctrines and rituals.<\/p>\n

The Corruptions Of The Pre-Reformation Period<\/h2>\n

By the time of the pre-Reformation period, many of the Church’s corrupt practices had become commonplace. The sale and collection of indulgences was rampant, as was the practice of Simony (buying or selling positions in the Church hierarchy) and celibacy, which removed the importance of family life and the institution of marriage.
\nThe concept of ‘Hell’ as a physical place of punishment and the idea of confession as a way of confessing one’s sins and obtaining absolution were also key components of the corruption of Christianity during this period. The dependence of the Church on the monarchy, which entailed the increased control of the people by the Crown, further perpetuated these corruptions.<\/p>\n

The Reformation And Counter Reformation<\/h2>\n

The Protestant Reformation aimed to reform the Church, and although its leaders had initially denounced all corrupt practices, the overly rigid and restrictive techniques of the Church Fathers and their justification of ‘merits of works’ eventually caused the Reformation to become more focused on personal salvation and the discouragement of works-based salvation.
\nOn the other hand, the Counter Reformation adopted an anti-Protestant stance, defending the Catholics’ practices, yet in the process becoming stricter and stricter. The result was a comprehensive ban on such activities as reading the Bible in one’s own language and the issuance of censures and excommunications against those who opposed the Pope’s authority.<\/p>\n

The Corruptions Of The Modern World<\/h2>\n